Uncategorized

由 拿督斯里魏家祥博士 提呈 摘要 尽管大马教育文凭(SPM)考试每年都有标准化的学术成绩报告，其中 A+、A 和 A-都 属于 A 等级，可是教育部最近重新定义 2024 年考试中的 A 等级，将 A-排除在外，而 引发了争议。 这种突如其来又欠缺透明的做法，引发民众质疑今年与去年的 A-成绩的质量，同时有 违反政府此前承诺的精英制度，特别是首相拿督斯里安华于 2024 年 6 月 30 日宣布— —所有考获 10A 或以上成绩的学生将自动获得大学预科班学额。 这项政策转变和大学预科班录取的评分改变，已从副教育部长黄家和的面子书帖文 (2025 年 5 月 9 日)中获得证实，并严重影响不同族群和背景学生的教育规划和前 途。 此外，自去年以来，政府尚未解决考获所有科目 9 个 A+的学生仍然被排除在外的问 题，尽管这些学生在所有科目中都取得了最高等级。 马华强烈反对教育部将 A-排除在 A 等级之外的措施，这是一个不公正、行政偏差的决 定，它违反了公平、透明和择优录取的原则。其影响深远，从打乱学生的学业、造成 情绪困扰，到可能侵蚀公众对马来西亚国家考试制度的信任。 马华呼吁教育部，立即撤销这项政策，同时要求教育部长给予明确解释，并建立保障 措施，以防止未来再次发生这种随意更改成绩定义的行为。 根据策略分析与政策研究所(INSAP)的研究和咨询工作，这份声明阐述了马华的立 场，并通过数据点出其中的关键问题，并提出具长期影响力的全面政策改革建议。

Dibentangkan oleh Datuk Seri Ir. Dr. Wee Ka Siong, Presiden Malaysian Chinese Association (MCA) Ringkasan Eksekutif Saban tahun peperiksaan Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia (SPM) telah mengklasifikasikan gred A+, A dan A- sebagai sebahagian kategori Gred A. Oleh itu, pentakrifan semula kategori Gred A dalam SPM 2024 secara ad-hoc oleh Kementerian Pendidikan (KPM) baru-baru ini, khususnya dalam …

Kertas Pendirian: Pengecualian A- daripada Gred A dalam SPM 2024 Read More »

Presented by Datuk Seri Ir. Dr. Wee Ka Siong, President of Malaysian Chinese Association (MCA) Executive Summary Despite a standardised reporting of academic achievement for Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia (SPM) examination every year which included A+, A and A- as part of Grade A category, the Ministry of Education’s (MOE) recent ad-hoc redefinition of Grade A …

Position Paper: Exclusion of A- from Grade A in SPM 2024 Read More »

𝟏𝟓ᵗʰ 𝐀𝐬𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐟𝐞𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐕𝐚𝐥𝐝𝐚𝐢 𝐃𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐮𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐂𝐥𝐮𝐛 Join us for a dynamic day of expert insights and strategic discussions on the evolving geopolitical landscape in the Asia-Pacific region! This conference will bring together senior officials, policymakers, and experts from Malaysia, Russia, and other countries to discuss critical issues surrounding regional security, BRICS-Southeast Asia cooperation …

𝟏𝟓ᵗʰ 𝐀𝐬𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐟𝐞𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐕𝐚𝐥𝐝𝐚𝐢 𝐃𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐮𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐂𝐥𝐮𝐛 Read More »

The present world is a bi-polar world with US as the superpower and China as the main rival. China has made great strides in military power, Science and technology, space applications, agriculture, International Trade, Services, Manufacturing, etc. It is closely following the US and has given a stiff competition to the global superpower. As both countries happen to be very powerful, both economically and militarily, with none of the two willing to sub-serve the other, the battle for supremacy between the two is bound to hot up in the near future. So, how should the two countries DEAL with each other? Should there be coercion by military, economic and diplomatic means or cooperation through effective bargaining, mutual non-aggression, mutual non-interference in each other’s internal affairs and mutually shared responsibility?

Persons with disabilities (PWD) have been referred to, even up to recently as a “vulnerable group”. PWDs have been the main target group of social welfare planning for years, in general, or as a response to unemployment. The question here is, why are PWDs still “vulnerable”? Shouldn’t past policies or frameworks have guaranteed that this group would not be “exposed to the elements, as they are now? Could it be that current underlying narratives (that PWDs need only to be protected and not empowered) are perhaps the bane of society? Could it also be that these archaic perceptions of Malaysian society are the very things that stunt quality policy-making? Malaysian policy-makers will benefit from a paradigm shift – a change in perspectives, “woke” cognizance and an overall empathy for target communities, especially PWDs.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Quisque mauris velit, placerat at interdum quis, cursus ut nibh. Suspendisse tincidunt volutpat pulvinar. Phasellus et efficitur lectus. Donec eu pellentesque lorem, eget porta est. Suspendisse faucibus consectetur iaculis. In hac habitasse platea dictumst.